Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contextual Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) requires scalable and accurate retrieval of content relevant to the user's context. This paper presents a comparative study of two independent context retrieval methods: sequence and segment level scoring. Evaluated on datasets with up to 100k phrases, all methods exhibit excellent retrieval recall. Notably, the segment-level scoring achieves an outstanding 75.6% recall over 100k entities. When each method is further integrated with ASR through joint training, significant improvements over nonbiased ASR are observed, with WER reduction of up to 36% with 2k entities and 28% with 100k entities. This comparative analysis provides valuable insights for selecting the optimal context retrieval technique to achieve scalable and accurate performance in contextual ASR applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: