Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For the task of speech recognition, the use of more than 30 seconds of acoustic context during training is uncommon and under-investigated in literature. In this work, we conduct an empirical study on the effect of scaling the sequence length used to train/evaluate (dense-attention-based) acoustic models on speech recognition performance. For these experiments, a dataset of roughly 100,000 pseudo-labelled Spotify podcasts is used, with context lengths of 5 seconds to 1 hour being explored. Zero-shot evaluations are presented on the long-format datasets: Earnings-22, Tedlium and Rev16. Results demonstrate a benefit from training with up to 21.8 minutes of acoustic context, showing up to a 14.5% relative improvement from a baseline trained with 10 seconds of context. We find that the model's width/depth, positional encoding scheme and number of attention heads impact its ability to use longer contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flynn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: