Background: Simultaneous multislice (SMS) technology improves acquisition efficiency of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of SMS-DWI in image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements for focal liver lesions (FLLs) as compared with that of conventional DWI (CON-DWI). Methods: The institutional ethics committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University approved this single-center, prospective study conducted from February 2021 to March 2022. Free-breathing SMS-DWI and CON-DWI examinations were acquired on a 3-T scanner with b-values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm2. Qualitative image quality and quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and ADC were compared between SMS-DWI and CON-DWI. The ADC values for FLLs were further compared between SMS-DWI and CON-DWI in different patient subgroups. The intra- and interreader agreements were assessed. Significance was set at P<0.05. Results: This study included 116 patients (96 males, 20 females; mean age 52.0±10.7 years) with 119 FLLs. No significant differences were observed between SMS-DWI and CON-DWI regarding overall image quality in any b-value DWIs, and there were also no differences observed between SMS-DWI and CON-DWI (b=800 s/mm2) for either SNR or CNR (both P values >0.05). ADC values obtained from CON-DWI were higher than those from SMS-DWI in all FLLs [(1.31±0.47)×10−3 vs. (1.26±0.46)×10−3 mm2/s; P=0.004], and similar findings were observed across the different patient subgroups. The consistency analysis showed intrareader intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.792–0.944 and interreader ICC values of 0.758–0.861 for quantitative measurements (SNR, CNR, and ADC) and kappa values of 0.609–0.878 for qualitative image quality. Conclusions: SMS-DWI achieved a 37% reduction in scan time compared to CON-DWI while maintaining comparable overall image quality. Notably, the ADC values for FLLs were observed to be quantitatively lower with SMS-DWI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: