Introduction Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) are tumours of the gastro-intestinal tract that arise from connective tissue and they have potential for malignancy. A number of guidelines exist in their management. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of these guidelines. Methods A search of the literature was undertaken for appropriate guidelines pertaining to the diagnosis and management of GISTs. The AGREE II checklist was used to assess the current GIST guidelines. Results A total of nine guidelines were included in this study. The overall median score across all guidelines was 68% (lowest; 50%, highest 89%). Guidelines tended to score highly in Domain IV (Clarity of Presentation, median score 76%) as well as Domain VI (Editorial Independence, 67%) and Domain I (Scope and Purpose, 61%). However, lower scores were noted in the Domain V (Applicability, 39%), Domain III (Rigor of Development, 52%) and Domain II (Stakeholder Involvement, 56%). None of the guidelines scored a unanimous ‘Yes’ vote for clinical usage, and all needed some level of modifying. Conclusion Whilst some of the current guidelines for the management of GISTs is of a high quality, there is a need for improvement with regards to the quality of the methodology used to formulate the guidelines and how they can be implemented in daily clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Askari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: