Background The updated NELA Standards, encourage pre-operative decision-making, were published and utilised from April 2023. Our busy district general hospital has not been audited against these updated standards. Methods Single-centre, retrospective audit of emergency laparotomies between April 2023 and December 2023. Patients were included if the NELA risk score was ≥5% (‘high-risk’) or if they were deemed ‘high-risk’ based on clinical judgement. Demographic, management, and outcome data were collected from the local NELA database and EPR. The primary outcome was the proportion of ‘high-risk’ patients directly admitted to critical care. The secondary outcome was to investigate differences between high-risk patients admitted to critical care and those admitted to ward care using length of stay (LOS) and 30-day observed/expected (O/E) mortality ratio. Results 112 laparotomies were performed and 43 (38%) were deemed ‘high-risk’. Of ‘high-risk’ patients, the median age was 73 (44 - 95), 56% were male, and the median mortality risk was 10.5% (3.1% – 62.7%). 38 ‘high-risk’ patients were directly admitted to critical care. They had a median LOS of 14 days (3 – 72) and 7 died within 30 days with an O/E mortality ratio of 1.12. None of the 5 patients admitted directly to the ward died and they had a median LOS of 8 days (3 – 39). Conclusion The mortality risk score is a tool for post-operative management in emergency laparotomy but appropriate clinical judgement can prevent excessive care and preserve critical care beds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adegboye et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: