Aims Poor patient flow and complex sub-specialty decision making discussions lengthened time to operation of lower priority operations e.g. appendicectomy/abscesses. By prioritising start times and registrar patient selection for low complexity cases/day case discharge, we rejuvenated the golden patient protocol (GPP) and assessed the implementation and impact of a novel GPP in a tertiary centre emergency list on surgical wait times and overall theatre flow. Methods The GPP was agreed between surgical/anaesthetic night registrars and theatre staff which took into consideration the urgency of the surgery, fitness of patient and anaesthetic/technical difficulties. Eligible patients were identified prior to 08:00 and scheduled as the first case of the day to be huddled and sent for by 08:30. Two cycles were conducted, one month before and after GPP introduction, using the trust theatre management system (TMIS). Results Time series analysis was conducted for patient sent-for, anaesthetic room entry, and procedure start times during both cycles. Results indicated a median decrease of 11-minutes in patient sent-for time (Cycle 1: 08:56, Cycle 2: 08:45) and a 12-minute reduction in median procedure start time (Cycle 1: 09:42, Cycle 2: 09:30). The proportion of low complexity cases performed first-on-list also increased by 22.5% (Cycle 1: 35.5%, Cycle 2: 58.0%). Conclusions This analysis demonstrates a positive change by starting theatre faster with lower complexity cases, developing surgical registrar independence, improving time to treatment without complex discussions delaying first send.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: