Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Aims Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a gastrointestinal emergency with varied patient outcomes. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients whose primary admission presentation was AUGIB versus inpatients who subsequently developed AUGIB as a complication. Methods This was a retrospective study of all adult patients receiving endoscopy for AUGIB in a single surgical unit from September 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, laboratory results, medical history and clinical progress, 30 and 90-day mortality were compared. Results 145 patients were identified, 75 (51.7%) were male and median age was 65 years (IQR 53-75). 117 presented to hospital with AUGIB (group 1) and 28 developed AUGIB as an inpatient (group 2). Median length-of-stay was 3.3 vs 10 days, respectively (p=0.014). Group 2 were more likely to present with symptomatic anaemia (p=0.001), higher National Early Warning System scores (p0.001), shock (p0.001), higher Glasgow-Blatchford score (p0.001) and require blood transfusions (p0.001). Group 2 had higher ASA Scores (p0.001) and higher 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. No statistical correlations were noted regarding the distribution of endoscopic diagnoses obtained between both groups.Group 1(n=117)Group 2(n=28)P-Value30-Day all-cause Mortality4 (3.4%)4 (14.3%)0.02490-Day all-cause Mortality9 (7.7%)8 (28.6)0.002 Conclusion Our results echo previous studies that patients who develop AUGIB whilst an inpatient have significantly poorer outcomes. Causation is likely multifactorial and warrants further study. It remains important to closely apply the AUGIB care bundle and early critical care input to optimize outcome.
Ng et al. (Sun,) studied this question.