Background Non-Consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs), when rotating through geriatric medicine, often take a comprehensive cognitive history for the first time. Graduate clinical exams often overlook this complex assessment, and knowledge of cognitive disorders amongst NCHDs is often limited. We aimed to create a template to guide NCHDs in taking this history, including investigations and management options. Methods We developed a 9-question survey, administered to a sample of representative NCHDs and specialist nurses who have rotated through our department, to gauge their confidence in assessing cognition. We examined their understanding of cognitive assessments and if a template would be useful. With consultants, we subsequently drafted an agreed guidance template for use at clinics. Results We included 35 respondents who rotated through geriatric medicine clinics this year; 8 registrars, 18 SHOs, 5 interns, 1 ANP. 10(31.25%) felt very confident completing a cognitive history, 17(53.13%) felt just somewhat confident and 5(15.65%) did not feel confident. Regarding investigating a new cognitive impairment (CI) n=10 (31.25%) felt very confident, 12(37.5%) felt somewhat confident and 10(31.25%) did not feel confident. Management of CI - 12(37.5%) felt very confident, 11(34.38%) felt somewhat confident and n=9 (28.13%) did not feel confident. MMSE, MOCA, clock drawing test, Addenbrooks and RUDAS were listed as cognitive assessments. Regarding investigations, CT/MRI Brain were mentioned in all but just n=12 mentioned a PET scan. Services listed included Occupational Therapy (20), Social Work (6), Dublin Alzheimer’s Society (6), psychology (6). Almost all 96.87% (31) felt a guide would be helpful and 100% of participants said that they would use it. Conclusion We identified gaps in confidence and knowledge amongst NCHDs regarding assessment of cognition. Consequently, we designed a guidance template to ensure rotating junior staff are more confident and informed during cognitive assessments at clinics in our department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Healy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: