This article takes a systematic approach to unpack how pro-government mass action emerges in autocracies. Both the channels and triggers of pro-regime mass action are considered using a large-n dataset of mass mobilization in autocracies between 2003 and 2017. We test quantitively how mass mobilization can occur in autocracies – through party elites and regime-affiliated organizations – and find stronger evidence for the role of elites in enabling pro-government mass action through their use of clientelistic linkages with constituents. However, contrary to expectation, in the aftermath of a particular trigger (i.e., anti-government protests) the likelihood of pro-government mobilization is highest when regime-affiliated organizations are weak or nonexistent. The magnitude of this effect is higher for violent anti-government opposition, as compared to nonviolent dissent, suggesting that violent anti-government opposition tactics tend to generate pro-government mobilization as a form of backlash against the violence and are more polarizing in autocratic civil societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: