PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 27, 2024International Journal of Geographical Information Science11 citations

Translating street view imagery to correct perspectives to enhance bikeability and walkability studies

View Full Paper
KIKoichi ItoMQMatías QuintanaXHXianjing Han

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Street view imagery (SVI), an emerging geospatial dataset, is useful for evaluating active transportation infrastructure, but it faces potential biases from its vehicle-based capture method, diverging from pedestrians' and cyclists' perspectives. Existing literature lacks both an examination of these biases and a solution. This study identifies and quantifies these biases by comparing conventional SVI with views from the road shoulder/sidewalk. To mitigate such perspective biases, we introduce a novel framework with generative adversarial network (GAN)-based image generation models (Pix2Pix and CycleGAN), an image regression model (ResNet-50), and a tabular model (LightGBM). Experiments assessed model effectiveness in translating car-centric views to those from pedestrian and cyclist perspectives. Results show significant differences in semantic indicators (e.g. green view index) between road center and road shoulder/sidewalk SVI, with low Pearson's correlation coefficients r (0.35–0.55 for road shoulders and 0.45–0.47 for sidewalks) indicating bias. The framework succeeded in creating realistic images and aligning pixel ratios between perspectives, achieving strong correlation coefficients (0.81 for road shoulders and 0.83 for sidewalks), thus reducing bias. This work contributes by providing a scalable and model-agnostic approach to produce accurate SVIs for urban planning and sustainability, setting a foundation for improving bikeability and walkability assessments and promoting active transportation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ito et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5aa67b6db643587544c2ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2391969
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment2006 · 503 citations
  2. 2Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments2020 · 150 citations
  3. 3Influence of infrastructural compatibility factors on walking and cycling route choices2013 · 128 citations
  4. 4A study on street walkability for older adults with different mobility abilities combining street view image recognition and deep learning - The case of Chengxianjie Community in Nanjing (China)2024 · 38 citations
  5. 5The active commuting route environment scale (ACRES): development and evaluation2010 · 43 citations