In the section Writing "the Jewish Experience in America", in the third paragraph, the sixth sentence has been altered to read: "Benjamin Schreier notes that even Jewish literary study itself, not just the critic-author sphere, could be "understood in terms of a history of the desire for a representational concept of The Jew rather than as part of the history of the representation of Jews" (22)." instead of: "Benjamin Schreier notes that even in Jewish literary study, not just in the critic-author sphere, Good as Gold was mostly a "history of the desire for a representational concept of The Jew rather than as part of the history of the representation of Jews" (22).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2024 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: