Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper first analyzed the shortcomings of the summative final exam methods which focuses only on final exams. Then, we showed the specific implementation of the quantitative formative assessment which includes objective results and subjective scores. Objective results include the traditional written chapter test score, online mid-term and final exam scores, whereas the subjective scores include class attendance, homework, class performance, class notes, online learning on the "Jreenity" platform, chapter mind maps, the completion of ideological and political cases, and the introduction of mathematicians. Finally, the reforming achievement of the formative assessment was summarized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: