Titanium dental implants, traditionally used for tooth replacement, face certain biological and esthetic limitations. Recently, zirconia has become a notable alternative, valued for its esthetics and biocompatibility. This study evaluated the efficacy of 2-piece zirconia dental implants, particularly their impact on inflammatory cytokines and their survival rate over 1 year. This study was a single-center, prospective trial and included adults aged 18 and above. From 2021 to 2022, 9 2-piece, tissue-level zirconia implants were placed in 8 patients. Following a 3-month osseointegration phase, crowns were cemented. Over a year, we assessed plaque and gingival indices, pocket depth, and tissue color and texture. Peri-apical radiographs measured bone levels, and IL-1β in peri-implant crevicular fluid was quantified using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Eight subjects (ages 31–63) participated. One implant failed after 6 months, resulting in a 1-year survival rate of 88.8%. Plaque and gingival indices rose, but peri-implant soft tissue remained stable in color and texture. At 12 months, average bone loss was minimal and insignificant compared with the baseline, and IL-1β levels were similar to those at contralateral teeth with no correlation between IL-1β, pocket depth, and bleeding on probing. Two-piece zirconia implants emerged as a viable tooth replacement option with an 88.8% 1-year survival rate. They maintained stable soft tissue and bone levels, indicating their potential as effective dental restoratives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: