Aim. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of a high-power short-duration (HPSD) strategy for ablation index (AI) - guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using different power settings. Methods. 185 patients were scheduled for AI guided ablation. Patients were randomized into 2 groups and every group was divided into two subgroups. First group (n=95) PVI was performed with 50W. Second group (n=90) with 45 W. In Ia and IIa AI was 400-450 au (arbitrary unit) in posterior wall and 500-550 au. in the anterior wall. In Ib and IIb AI was 400-450 au in posterior wall and 450-500 au in the anterior wall. Results. Efficacy of the PVI was 100% in all patients. Within 6 months, atrial fibrillation recurred in Ia, Ib, IIa and IIb subgroups were 5/55 (9,0%), 4/40 (10%), 6/50 (12%) и 5/40 (12,5%) p >0,05. First-pass PVI in Ia, Ib, IIa and IIb subgroups were 53/55 (96,36%), 37/40 (92.5%), 46/50 (92%), 36/40 (90,5%) (p>0,05). There was no significant intra operative complications. The total procedure time was 55±10 min, 50±8 min, 60±10 min, 56±9 min (p>0,05). Conclusions. HPSD ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation significantly reduces the procedure time, does not increase the incidence of intraoperative complications and is effective in the short term results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fayez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: