This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Screening for transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) is an important step for the safety of blood transfusion. Major TTIs for which screening is done are hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, and malaria. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of treponemal-specific chemiluminescence test and rapid card test for the screening of syphilis by taking Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA) as a gold standard test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. All the routine blood donors were screened according to the National Blood Transfusion Council guidelines. One hundred and twenty syphilis serology-positive samples were obtained either by rapid card test immunochromatographic test/chemiluminescence assay or both. These samples were further tested by TPHA (gold standard test). Statistical analysis was done using the Mcnemar test, DeLong et al. test, and Chi-square test P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of both chemiluminescence and rapid card test were comparable ( P < 0.0001) and the diagnostic accuracy of chemiluminescence and rapid card test was 95.83% and 94.58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both chemiluminescence and rapid card tests show comparable performance, so it is concluded to use rapid card test as a reliable backup in remote areas, peripheral blood bank setup, and in emergency situations where timesaving is lifesaving.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: