Due to decarbonization issues, there is growing concern about greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO2). Gas hydrate research is a potential solution to energy needs and CO2 storage tasks. Naturally occurring methane hydrates provide natural gas availability, while CO2 hydrates are also receiving widespread attention for carbon capture, storage, and pipeline flow assurance. This study measured the thermodynamic equilibrium temperatures and pressures at the dissociation points for CO2 hydrate mixtures containing various additives. These results provide fundamental data on the thermodynamic phase boundaries of CO2 hydrate mixtures where three phases of hydrate (H), liquid water (Lw), and vapor (V) coexisted. The equilibrium conditions for CO2 with pure water and various additives including 2-methoxyethyl ether (0.20 and 0.30 mass fractions), 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (0.20 and 0.30 mass fractions), 4-methylmorpholine (0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mass fractions), urea (0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mass fractions), and 1,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine) (0.10 and 0.20 mass fractions) were experimentally measured in the pressure range of 1.54–3.58 MPa using the isochoric and temperature cycling method. These additives all had an inhibition effect on the formation of CO2 hydrates, and the maximum average inhibition effect of each additive on the equilibrium temperature ranged from 5 to 11 K. To simulate seawater conditions, equilibrium conditions for CO2 hydrate mixtures with three of these additives are also reported. The Clausius–Clapeyron equation was used to estimate possible hydrate structures. The results show that the CO2 hydrate mixtures exhibited possible sI structures after adding each additive in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: