This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Abstract The Antarctic ozone “hole” was discovered in 19851, and its primary cause is man-made ozone-depleting substances (ODS)2. Following reductions of ODSs under the Montreal Protocol3, signs of ozone recovery have been reported, based largely on observations and broad yet compelling model-data comparisons4. While such approaches are highly valuable, they do not establish levels of overall confidence that account for the temporal and spatial structure of Antarctic ozone trends as well as uncertainties in internal climate variability. Here, we rely on trend pattern information as a function of month and height to separate anthropogenically forced ozone responses from internal variability, using pattern-based detection and attribution (D&A) methods as employed in climate change studies5–11. The analysis uses satellite observations together with both single-model and multi-model ensemble simulations to identify and quantify the month-height Antarctic ozone recovery “fingerprint”12. We demonstrate that the data and simulations show remarkable agreement in the fingerprint pattern of the ozone response to decreasing ODS forcing since 2005. We also show that ODS forcing has enhanced ozone internal variability during the austral spring, influencing detection of forced responses and their time of emergence. Our results provide robust statistical and physical evidence that actions taken under the Montreal Protocol to reduce ODSs are indeed resulting in Antarctic ozone recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: