Robotic systems are becoming pervasive and adopted in increasingly many domains, such as manufacturing, healthcare, and space exploration.To this end, engineering software has emerged as a crucial discipline for building maintainable and reusable robotic systems.The field of robotics software engineering research has received increasing attention, fostering autonomy as a fundamental goal.However, robotics developers are still challenged trying to achieve this goal given that simulation is not able to deliver solutions to realistically emulate real-world phenomena.Robots also need to operate in unpredictable and uncontrollable environments, which require safe and trustworthy self-adaptation capabilities implemented in software.Typical techniques to address the challenges are runtime verification, field-based testing, and mitigation techniques that enable fail-safe solutions.However, there is no clear guidance to architect ROS-based systems to enable and facilitate runtime verification and field-based testing.This paper aims to fill in this gap by providing guidelines that can help developers and quality assurance (QA) teams when developing, verifying or testing their robots in the field.These guidelines are carefully tailored to address the challenges and requirements of testing
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: