This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different adhesive solutions on the surface roughness and hardness of denture base materials. Twenty specimens (20 × 20 × 5 mm) were produced for each material group: heat-cured ProBase Hot®, 3D-printed NextDent Denture 3D+®, and PMMA-milled Exaktus®. They were then divided into five solution subgroups (n = 4): control (T0), distilled water, Corega PowerMax®, Elgydium Fix®, and Kukident Pro Ultimate®. Specimens were immersed in the solution at 37 °C daily for 28 days, simulating continuous use. Profilometry and Shore D hardness tests were performed at baseline and after 28 days of the immersion protocol. Data analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics 30.0, considering a confidence level of 0.05. At baseline, the materials differed in surface roughness and Shore D hardness, with the 3D-printed group showing the highest median values for the Rz parameter (p = 0.023) and the lowest for hardness (p = 0.023). Elgydium Fix had a significant effect on the heat-cured resin, with increased Rz and decreased hardness. Kukident caused higher roughness and lower hardness in the 3D-printed and milled resins (not significant). Corega showed minor effects in all tested materials. In conclusion, the denture base material and the adhesive formulation influence the physical and mechanical properties of denture base resins.
Alves et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: