Correlational analysis reveals significant relationships between academic stress, self-efficacy, and self-concept, indicating gender influences these levels.
Academic stress is an imbalance between the demands of a task and a person's ability to complete it. Academic stress in higher education often occurs among students, especially those who are also students (students). The inability to complete a final assignment, which leads to academic stress, is caused by several factors. Self-efficacy and self-concept the low ones are owned by students, gender also influences the high or low levels of academic stress experienced by students. This study aims to determine academic stress from a perspective self-efficacy and self-concept with gender as a moderator for the students. The type of research used was explanatory correlational, with a sample of 100 students of Ma'had Darul Qur'al wal Hadits NWDI Pancor using the technique purposive sampling. The instrument used in data collection uses a scale Self-Efficacy, Self-Concept, and academic stress. Data analysis techniques using moderated regresion analysis (MRA) and one way anova. The research results show self-efficacy has a significant relationship with academic stress, self-concept has a significant relationship with academic stress, self-efficacy and self-concept simultaneously have a significant relationship to academic stress, and gender has a strong influence on academic stress in terms of self-efficacy and self-concept, this shows that gender has a significant relationship with academic stress when viewed from self-efficacy and self-concept. The research results obtained in this study indicate a relationship between each variable separately and academic stress, while this study confirms that the combination of the two provides a significant contribution related to the level of academic stress and its influence gender against academic stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Indriani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: