Evaluation of tissue-based valved conduits and transcatheter valves in sheep, suggesting reduced interventions for congenital valve disease.
Background: Congenital valve disease requires multiple interventions throughout a patient's lifetime as conventional bioprosthetic valves degrade and calcify. Current replacement options lack growth potential and lifelong durability, necessitating repeated surgeries for patients with congenital valve defect. Objective: Evaluate bioengineered lab-grown tissue heart valves utilizing two complementary approaches: (1) a fibroblast-derived collagenous matrix valved conduit with somatic growth potential for surgical implantation, and (2) a bioengineered tissue-leaflet transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) for minimally invasive intervention. Methods: For the valved conduit approach, 19mm conduits were implanted in growing lambs (n=3) for 52 weeks. For the TPV approach, bioengineered tissue leaflets mounted on nitinol stents were delivered via an 18Fr system and implanted in juvenile sheep (n=5) for up to 18 months. Both approaches were evaluated through serial echocardiography and histological assessment at explant. Results: The valved conduits demonstrated somatic growth with increased diameter (38%) and leaflet length (25%) while maintaining mild or less regurgitation. The TPV implants showed sustained effective orifice area (>2cm²) without increased pressure gradients (<10mmHg) or regurgitation. Both approaches exhibited favorable histology with minimal calcification and appropriate cellular infiltration. The valved conduits successfully integrated with myocardium and demonstrated feasibility of subsequent stent placement, creating a pathway for future intervention without reoperation. Conclusion: This dual-approach platform addresses immediate clinical needs through the TPV option while providing long-term solutions via the growth-accommodating valved conduit. The combined strategy offers potential for significantly reducing surgical interventions for children with congenital heart defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syedain et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: