Extending a recent turn at the interstice of Black and animal studies, this article analyzes two works by Martinican writers: Frantz Fanon’s (2008/1952) Black Skin, White Masks , and Patrick Chamoiseau’s (2018/1997) The Old Slave and the Mastiff . I read Fanon’s concept of “sociogeny” as an effort to conceptualize Black subjectivity within a reformulated analytic of European phenomenology, interpreting it as a non-anthroponormative mode of meaning-making that is independent of language or consciousness. In this light, Fanon’s human becomes an animal able to recognize their non-humanization. My interpretation of Chamoiseau highlights the implications of Fanon’s concept for understanding the coproduction and incommensurability of “race” and “animality.” Enslaved man and mastiff are subject to an identity that is not merely discursive but sociogenic, and both possess an agency that exceeds their subjectivation at the enslaver’s hands. Chamoiseau, I argue, directly represents what Fanon leaves only tacit: sociogeny beyond the human.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christie Oliver-Hobley (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: