Optical and photoemission measurements were performed on alkali antimonide Na₂KSb and Na₂KSb/CsₓSb photocathodes in order to determine their energy-band diagrams, elucidate the photoemission pathways, and explore the options for interface engineering in order to reach high quantum efficiencies of the photocathodes. This study is motivated by the recent discovery of optical orientation in Na₂KSb and emission of spin-polarized electrons from Na₂KSb/CsₓSb photocathodes [V.S. Rusetsky et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 166802 (2022)]. We have shown that the band gap Eg of Na₂KSb at $T=295$ K lies within the range of 1.40--1.44 eV. The Na₂KSb surface activation by the deposition of Cs and Sb results in effective electron affinity decrease by approximately 0.37 eV, and in an increase of the quantum efficiency up to 0.2 electrons per incident photon. The analysis of longitudinal energy distribution curves (EDCs) proves that the surface of activated Na₂KSb/CsₓSb photocathodes have negative effective electron affinity of approximately -0.1 and -0.25 eV at $T=295$ and 80 K, respectively. EDC measurements under increasing photon energy ω demonstrate the transition of photoemission pathway from the surface states' photoionization at ω<Eg to the emission from the conduction-band bottom at ω≈Eg and from the states with high kinetic energy in the conduction band at ω>Eg. EDCs measured at 80 K reveal a highly directional photoelectron emission from the Na₂KSb/CsₓSb photocathode, as compared to the p-GaAs(Cs,O) photocathode. This fact, along with the observed significant, by an order of magnitude, increase in the photoluminescence intensity under the Na₂KSb surface activation by Cs and Sb, indicates relatively weak diffuse scattering in the ``quasiepitaxial'' CsₓSb activation layer of a Na₂KSb/CsₓSb photocathode, compared to strong scattering in the amorphous (Cs,O) activation layer of a p-GaAs(Cs,O) photocathode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozhkov et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: