Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates reduced cutting force and surface roughness in milling processes, indicating improved machining quality over empirical methods.
Since the selection of machining parameters usually relies on the experience of workers or traditional calculation formulas, the traditional prediction method has the disadvantages of a complicated arithmetic process, large prediction deviation, and high consumption cost, making it challenging to meet the increasing demand of production and processing. Therefore, this paper proposes a machining quality prediction model based on the GA-BP neural network. Through experiments, it verifies the data-fitting ability of the prediction model and then takes the prediction model as the optimization objective, culminating in a multi-objective optimization model for process parameters based on the NSGA-II algorithm. Experiments demonstrate that the cutting force and surface roughness obtained by the optimization model are 3.6% and 10.0% lower than those obtained by the empirical parameters, respectively, leading to reductions of 3.6% and 10.6%, which verified the optimization effect of the model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miao et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: