This paper examines the motivations behind the increased U.S. activities in the South China Sea (SCS) and the impact on U.S.-China relations. By analysing the security dilemma and applying realism theory, the study identifies three key phases: the Obama administrations Pivot to Asia, the post-2016 arbitration ruling response, and the Biden administrations diplomatic efforts. The paper highlights the strategic importance of the SCS, U.S. military and diplomatic manoeuvres, and Chinas reactions. The findings reveal how these actions exacerbate the security dilemma, influencing both nations regional and global standings. The study concludes that transparent dialogue is crucial to mitigating tensions and avoiding further escalation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yida Li (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: