Henrietta Howard: mistress, survivor, imperialist?

Traditionally, Henrietta Howard has been seen through the lens of her role as George II's mistress and a 'woman of reason' who was connected to the leading men of her day. More recently, Henrietta Howard has been reinterpreted as a minor feminist icon: a survivor, who overcame childhood tragedy, an abusive marriage, and the patriarchal system to become a leading cultural patron, living in comfort at the home she built, Marble Hill. This article seeks to situate Henrietta as a beneficiary of, and participant in, imperial activity and exchange. Today these two interpretations - Henrietta as 'survivor' and Henrietta as 'imperialist';- feel at odds with one another. Present-day attitudes mean that a feel-good, 'girlboss'; feminist narrative about Henrietta's life, does not sit easily with the fact that she benefitted from transatlantic slavery. However, I argue the two readings can be reconciled, creating a new interpretation, when we consider that it was through imperial activity that Georgian women such as Henrietta Howard were able to materially benefit, survive and even thrive.