Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Esophageal carcinoma is one of the deadliest cancer in gastrointestinal system with 5-years survival of only 24%. Lymphnode metastasis has been associated with worse outcome. But the extent of lymphnode dissection has been a debate among surgeons worldwide. This study aimed to compare the overall survival of patients undergoing radical and non-radical lymphadenectomy in a tertiary referral cancer hospital in Nepal. Methodology: This study included 634 patients of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer who underwent surgical resection at our institution over a period of 2001- 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups; radical lymphadenectomy (RLN) and non-radical lymphadenectomy (NRLN) groups. RLN group underwent two-field or three field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer and D2 or D2 + lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy for GEJ cancer. NRLN group underwent nodal sampling or D1 dissection. Results: RLN was performed in 85.9%. NRLN was done in 14.1%. Surgery alone was performed in 47.1% and multimodality approach in 52.9% cases. Median survival for RLN and NRLN groups was 34 and 15 months, respectively (p < .001). Conclusion: Improved median survival has been observed after radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal and GEJ cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adhikari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: