The article examines the essence of conducting an investigative operation through videocommunication the criminal procedure provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Armenia as an exclusive measure, the grounds for conducting an investigative operation through videocommunication the criminal procedure, and the procedural procedure for conducting an investigative operation through videocommunication the criminal procedure. While studying the selected topic, the legislative features of conducting an investigative action through videocommunication the use of a special case and the practical significance of its implementation were analyzed. The topicality of the chosen topic is due to the different interpretation of the legal provisions on investigative actions by means of the species. The purpose of the research of this topic is to study the features and grounds of investigative action in criminal proceedings using forensics, in particular, to identify the essence of conducting investigative actions through videocommunication forensics in criminal proceedings, the logic of legal regulations on the grounds for conducting investigative actions through videocommunication forensics, and the presumed will of the legislator, as well as to identify investigative procedures through videocommunication forensics features and problems of the procedural order of execution of the action. When studying the topic selected in the article, the legal comparative method, deductive and inductive, as well as analysis and abstraction methods were used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Artur Ghambaryan (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: