Anticipating the future is a highly uncertain but essential task in policy-making made complex by the existence of both linear and non-linear policy dynamics. One framework which is useful in anticipating both kinds of change is the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) which has expanded from looking mainly at aspects of policy-making such as agenda-setting to depicting other complex activities related to policy implementation and administration among others. Precisely how longer-term policy dynamics can be viewed through the MSF framework, however, remains unclear. This article re-examines common depictions of policy trajectories and argues that using a concept borrowed from Future Studies - the "plausibility cone" – can fill this gap in MSF modelling and help both policy-makers and policy scholars better understand likely and unlikely possible policy futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Migone et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: