This study investigates psychometric properties and construct validity of the German online Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale 1 (GSS 1). In Study 1, N = 206 participants performed the online GSS 1. The number of immediately, correctly recalled details of the GSS 1 story indicated sufficient psychometric properties and was negatively correlated with suggestibility subscales (Yield 1, Yield 2, and Shift). In Study 2, N = 101 participants performed the online GSS 1, the online working memory ability test of the Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R, and the online Conflict-Monitoring-Questionnaire (CMQ-28). Individual differences of working memory ability measured by means of GSS 1 story recall and the Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R emerged to be convergent constructs. Individual differences of working memory ability and suggestibility are diverging constructs correlating either negatively or non-significantly. Individual differences of suggestibility and CMQ-28 subscales are widely diverging constructs correlating mainly non-significantly despite sufficient a-priori calculated sample size. The present results on individual differences of working memory ability, suggestibility and CMQ-conflict monitoring contribute to the investigation of convergent and discriminant validity in a non-forensic domain with a low level of social pressure. Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of these performance and personality dimensions remain to be investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leue et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: