Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the differential predictions for the rapidity distribution of pseudoscalar Higgs boson through gluon fusion at the LHC. These results are obtained taking into account the soft-virtual (SV) as well as the next-to-soft virtual (NSV) resummation effects to next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>NNLL</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="true">¯</a:mo></a:mover></a:math>) accuracy and matching them to the approximate fixed order next-to-next-to-leading-order (<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>NNLO</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mi mathvariant="normal">A</e:mi></e:msub></e:math>) computation. We perform the resummation in two-dimensional Mellin space by limiting ourselves to the contributions only from gluon-gluon (<h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mrow><h:mi>g</h:mi><h:mi>g</h:mi></h:mrow></h:math>) initiated channels. The <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mi>NNLO</j:mi></j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="normal">A</j:mi></j:msub></j:math> rapidity distribution of pseudoscalar Higgs is obtained by applying a ratio method on the NNLO rapidity distribution of the scalar Higgs boson. We also present the first analytical results of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msup><m:mi mathvariant="normal">N</m:mi><m:mn>3</m:mn></m:msup><m:mi>LO</m:mi></m:math> rapidity distribution of pseudoscalar Higgs at <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mrow><p:mi>SV</p:mi><p:mo>+</p:mo><p:mi>NSV</p:mi></p:mrow></p:math> accuracy. The phenomenological impacts of <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:msub><r:mrow><r:mi>NNLO</r:mi></r:mrow><r:mi mathvariant="normal">A</r:mi></r:msub><r:mo>+</r:mo><r:mover accent="true"><r:mi>NNLL</r:mi><r:mo stretchy="true">¯</r:mo></r:mover></r:math> predictions for 13 TeV LHC are studied. We observe that for <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:msub><w:mi>m</w:mi><w:mi>A</w:mi></w:msub><w:mo>=</w:mo><w:mn>125</w:mn><w:mo stretchy="false">(</w:mo><w:mn>700</w:mn><w:mo stretchy="false">)</w:mo><w:mtext> </w:mtext><w:mtext> </w:mtext><w:mi>GeV</w:mi></w:math> the <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mrow><ab:mi>SV</ab:mi><ab:mo>+</ab:mo><ab:mi>NSV</ab:mi></ab:mrow></ab:math> resummation at the <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:mover accent="true"><cb:mi>NNLL</cb:mi><cb:mo stretchy="true">¯</cb:mo></cb:mover></cb:math> level brings about 14.76% (11.48%) corrections to the <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:msub><gb:mrow><gb:mi>NNLO</gb:mi></gb:mrow><gb:mi mathvariant="normal">A</gb:mi></gb:msub></gb:math> results at the central scale value of <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jb:msub><jb:mi>μ</jb:mi><jb:mi>R</jb:mi></jb:msub><jb:mo>=</jb:mo><jb:msub><jb:mi>μ</jb:mi><jb:mi>F</jb:mi></jb:msub><jb:mo>=</jb:mo><jb:msub><jb:mi>m</jb:mi><jb:mi>A</jb:mi></jb:msub></jb:math>. Further, we find that the sensitivity to the renormalization scale gets improved substantially by the inclusion of NSV resummed predictions at <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:mover accent="true"><lb:mi>NNLL</lb:mi><lb:mo stretchy="true">¯</lb:mo></lb:mover></lb:math> accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravindran et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: