3D-Printed poly-є-caprolactone (PCL)-scaffolds are safe for cell support, but their hydrophobicity, bioinertness, and smooth surface limits bioactive/biomimetic performance. This can be overcome by providing biophysicochemical and biomechanical signals using amine (NH2) or carboxyl (COOH)-surface functionalization via wet-chemical treatment or plasma-assisted modification, but the alteration extent and hence bone-cell activity is unknown. We aimed to investigate the influence of NH2 or COOH-surface functionalization via wet-chemical treatment or plasma-assisted modification on biophysicochemical and biomechanical properties of 3D-printed PCL-scaffolds and osteogenic activity. In PCL/NH2 and PCL/COOH scaffolds, only wet-chemical treatment increased void size and surface-roughness, but both treatments reduced water contact angle. Wet-chemical treatment decreased, but plasma-assisted modification increased the elastic modulus. Finite-element modeling revealed that in all scaffolds, maximum von Mises stress under 2% compression-strain did not surpass yield stress for bulk material, indicating excellent mechanical stability and fracture resistance. Wet-chemical treatment and plasma-assisted modification increased pre-osteoblast proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, and mineral deposition. Wet-chemical treatment increased Fgf2 mRNA, while both treatments increased Cox2 mRNA. Only wet-chemical treatment increased collagen production. In conclusion, NH2 and COOH-surface functionalization of 3D-printed PCL-scaffolds via wet-chemical treatment was superior to plasma-assisted modification in enhancing osteogenic activity, and is therefore more promising for in vivo bone formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seddiqi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: