Aim: To compare frozen section (FS) diagnosis with routine histopathological diagnosis using parafnembedded sections. Materials And Methods: This retrospective analytical study included 42 FS specimens and corresponding parafn-embedded sections from June 2018 to Nov 2020. FS reports were compared with parafn section reports for diagnostic accuracy, considering parafn section diagnosis as the gold standard. Discordant cases were analyzed to identify reasons for disparity. Results: The accuracy rate was 89.18%, with 10.2% discordance. Sensitivity, specicity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.4%, 71.4%, 94.1%, and 62.5%, respectively. The average turnaround time (TAT) was 25 minutes. Conclusion: FS remains a reliable intraoperative diagnostic tool. Measures such as thorough tissue sampling, clear pathologist-surgeon communication, and second pathologist review in challenging cases can limit diagnostic discrepancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gitanjali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: