In this study, we revisit the extraction of parton-to-<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msubsup><a:mi>K</a:mi><a:mi>S</a:mi><a:mn>0</a:mn></a:msubsup></a:math> hadron fragmentation functions, named FF24-<c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msubsup><c:mi>K</c:mi><c:mi>S</c:mi><c:mn>0</c:mn></c:msubsup></c:math>, focusing on both next-to-leading-order and next-to-next-to-leading-order accuracy in perturbative QCD. Our approach involves the analysis of single inclusive electron-positron annihilation (SIA) data. The two key improvements are, on the one hand, the incorporation of the latest experimental data from the BESIII experiment and, on the other hand, the adoption of neural networks in the fitting procedure. To address experimental uncertainties, the Monte Carlo method is employed. Our investigation also explores the impact of hadron mass corrections on the description of SIA data, spanning a broad kinematic regime with a particular emphasis on the range of small <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>z</e:mi></e:math> values. The theory prediction for <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msubsup><g:mi>K</g:mi><g:mi>S</g:mi><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:msubsup></g:math> production at both NLO and NNLO accuracy exhibits good agreement with experimental data within their respective uncertainties. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soleymaninia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: