Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 12, 2024International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesOpen Access

A comparative study of chlorhexidine-coated tulle gras versus polyurethane adhesive film for donor site wound dressing in split skin graft cases

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PVParesh VhoraMBMayur BaviskarRVRiya Vakil

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Vhora et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6087cb6db64358759c327https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241959
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Role of Chlorhexidine Tulle and Collagen Sheet for Split Skin Graft Donor Site Dressing2025
  2. 2Efficacy of Topical Heparin Spray on Donor Site Wound Healing Time Compared to Conventional Dressing Among Patients Undergoing Split Thickness Skin Grafting2024
  3. 3COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AMNION-CollaGee [COLLAGEN–GELATIN–ELASTIN] AS A BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT WOUND DRESSING AND CONVENTIONAL DRESSING ON THE DONOR SITE OF THE SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT IN ANIMALS MODEL (RATS)2024
  4. 4Clinical evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the Tromboguard® hemostatic dressing for donor sites of split-thickness skin graft: A multicenter study2024
  5. 5Chitosan‐based dressing for management of palatal donor site: A randomized clinical trial2024 · 3 citations