In this paper, a "centrality" estimator based on flattenicity (ρ) is studied in proton-led (p-Pb) collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV using PYTHIA 8 Angantyr. Although Angantyr is still under development, the existing implementation is enough to study the particle production in systems where medium effects are absent. Firstly, ALICE data on pseudorapidity distributions as a function of the forward multiplicity (V0M), as well as transverse momentum distributions of identified particles in non-single diffractive p-Pb collisions, are compared with Angantyr. Secondly, the average number of binary nucleon-nucleon (Ncoll) collisions for different "centrality" estimators are compared. The studies include the following "centrality" estimators: V0M, ρ and midrapidity multiplicity (CL1). On one hand, the "centrality" dependence of Ncoll for the ρ selection shows the smallest deviations ($<8$ %) with respect to that obtained using impact parameter b; on the other hand, the V0M and CL1 yield huge deviations (up to a factor 2) with respect to the results using b. The particle ratios and nuclear modification factors (QpPb) as a function of pT are also studied. The proton-to-pion ratio exhibits a flow-like peak at intermediate pT (2-8 GeV/c) with little or no "centrality" dependence for V0M, ρ and b selections. The kaon-to-pion ratio as a function of pT is "centrality" independent for the same selections. On the contrary, for the CL1 class the ratios exhibit the typical behaviour associated with hard physics. Regarding QpPb, a peak at intermediate pT ($2-8$ GeV/c) for different particle species is observed when the "centrality" is obtained with b or ρ. The observed features diminish for the selections based on V0M and CL1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velasquez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: