Metal dihydride dihydrogen‐derived intermediates can be short‐lived and difficult to detect despite their ubiquitous role in chemical transformations such as hydrogenation. Here, highly reactive [Ir(H) 3 (η 2 ‐η 2 ‐COD)(IMes)] forms by trapping [Ir(H) 2 (η 2 ‐H 2 )(η 2 ‐η 2 ‐COD)(IMes)]X [X=Cl or MeO], resulting from reaction of the Ir(I) precatalyst [IrCl(η 2 ‐η 2 ‐COD)(IMes)] with a base and H 2 . This trihydride allows access to the unusual [Ir 2 (H) 4 (OMe)(IMes) 2 (pyridine) 3 ]X, [Ir 2 (H) 2 (μ 2 ‐H) 2 (η 2 ‐η 2 ‐COD)(IMes) 2 ], [Ir 3 (H) 9 (IMes) 3 ], [Ir 4 (H) 12 (IMes) 4 ] and [Ir 2 (H) 4 (μ 2 ‐H) 2 (IMes) 2 (pyridine) 2 ]. A combination of 2D NMR, parahydrogen hyperpolarized NMR, MS, and XRD are used to characterise these reaction products and rationalise their formation via the moiety {Ir(H) 3 (IMes)}. Consequently, the results of these studies have implications for iridium‐catalyzed polarization transfer from parahydrogen via the well‐known precursor [IrCl(η 2 ‐η 2 ‐COD)(IMes)].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tickner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: