Background The management of mitral valve disease in young children is challenging. Mechanical mitral valves could provide long-term durability; however, the need for anticoagulation increases the risk profile of mechanical valves. We report our experience in mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children under 2 years of age and evaluate factors affecting the outcomes. The study included all patients younger than 2 years who underwent mechanical MVR between 2000 and 2023. The study outcomes were mitral valve reoperation, bleeding, valve-related thrombosis, and survival. Results Twenty-three patients were included, with a mean age of 10.2 ± 5.9 months. The mitral valve sizes ranged from 16 to 25 mm, and 6 (26%) were placed in the supra-annular position. Complete heart block occurred in seven patients (30%), and operative mortality occurred in three patients (13%). Postoperative warfarin was used in 17 patients (74%). After discharge, bleeding occurred in five patients (22%), four were managed conservatively, and one had intracranial hemorrhage treated with craniotomy. Nine patients (39%) had valve-related thrombosis; two underwent reoperation, while seven were treated with alteplase in 26 patients. Valve-related thrombosis was more common in patients with supra-annular valves ( p < 0.001) and in those who were not on warfarin ( p < 0.001). A total of seven patients (30%) underwent redo MVR, and redo was more common in young patients ( p = 0.029) and in patients with supra-annular valves ( p < 0.001). Survival of the whole cohort was 73% at 5 years. Among the annular position group, 5-year survival was 88%, while among the supra-annular position group, survival was 50% after 3 months and 25% after 14 months ( p = 0.009). Conclusions Mechanical MVR in children younger than 2 years is associated with high complication rates, including thrombosis and bleeding. The supra-annular valve position appears to be a risk factor for thrombosis and reoperation. Anticoagulation with warfarin remains challenging. However, further studies evaluating alternative options are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mashali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: