Introduction and Objective to assess the work-related damages in frontline health care professionals to cases of COVID-19 in the initial phase of the pandemic period. Method analytical cross-sectional study, with health professionals, at all levels of care in the national territory. Data collection carried out between April and June 2020, through a sociodemographic and labor characterization questionnaire; the Job Stress Scale and the Work-Related Harm Assessment Scale. A multinomial logistic regression was built to analyze the factors associated with global damage. Results among 437 participants, the highest average of damages was for the physical dimension. Moderate global harm was associated with: nursing technician/auxiliary, weekly shift of 60 hours or more, and psychosocial condition of active or high-strain work. High global harm was associated with: age up to 45 years, having a morbidity, nursing technician/assistant, and psychosocial condition of active or passive or high-strain work. Low social support at work increased the chance of moderate and high harm. Discussion and Conclusion in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario, a profile of workers was observed who deserve special attention in work-related risk and disease prevention programs
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mininel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: