Aim: This study evaluated the fracture resistance of endocrowns with two marginal preparation designs and manufactured with two all ceramic materials.Methods: Twenty endodontically treated maxillary premolar teeth were prepared to receive endocrown restorations and divided into two equal main groups according to the preparation designs; endocrowns with butt joint design and endocrowns with ferrule design (n=10). The main groups were subdivided into two equal subgroups according to all ceramic material used; endocrowns manufactured from Vita Ambria and endocrowns manufactured from Vita Suprinity (n=5). The endocrown restorations were cemented to the prepared teeth using dual cured self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were subjected to thermo-cycling. All specimens were subjected to a compressive force until fracture by using universal testing machine. The maximum compressive force was recorded for all the specimens, then the failure modes were examined using a digital microscope.Results: Regarding the two materials effect, there were non-significant difference between Vita Ambria and Vita Suprinity on fracture resistance (P=0.66). Regarding the two marginal preparation designs effect, there were non-significant difference between butt joint and ferrule designs on fracture resistance (P=0.73). Regarding the failure mode, there was non-significant difference between all failure mode patterns in all groups except Vita Suprinity with butt joint design.Conclusion: There was no significant difference between Vita Ambria and Vita Suprinity endocrowns, either using ferrule or butt joint design in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nahla et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: