Purpose: This research aims to find out the relationship between optimism biases, burnout, and work stress with psychological well-being as a mediator and resilience as a moderator of mental health professionals from age 18 to 50. Design/Methodology/Approach: With the help of purposive sampling, data has been collected from various mental health professionals. For statical analysis, Smart PLS 4.0 has been used Findings: For statical analysis, Smart PLS has been used which shows a significant direct relationship between burnout and work stress (p<0.05) and a significant direct effect between optimism biases and work stress (p<0.05). Results also showed a moderating impact of resilience on burnout and work stress (p<0.05). This research is aimed to fill the gap in the literature and understand the dynamics of the variables. Implications/Originality/Value: In conclusion of the discussion, the relationship between optimism biases, burnout, and work stress has been studied with the mediating effect of psychological well-being and moderating impact of resilience. The results suggest a direct relationship between optimism biases, burnout, and work stress and a significant moderation of resilience between burnout and work stress. However, the mediation of psychological well-being was insignificant as well as the moderation of resilience between optimism biases and work stress
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Firdous et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: