⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

June 29, 2024African Journal of Biological SciencesOpen Access

Evaluating the Reliability of the ‘Beta’Angle and ‘W’Angle Compared To the ANB Angle for Sagittal Discrepancy

Radhika Agarwal

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the Beta angle and W angle in comparison with the ANB angle for assessing sagittal discrepancies in orthodontic patients. A total of 50 lateral cephalometric radiographs from patients with Class I and Class II division 1 malocclusion were analyzed.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Radhika Agarwal (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62acbb6db6435875bd73e https://doi.org/10.48047/afjbs.6.si3.2024.2598-2607

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparison of the reliability of ANB Sar and W measurements used in cephalometric diagnostics for the assessment of sagittal discrepancy2025
2COMPARATIVE RELIABILITY OF THE TAU ANGLE VERSUS YEN, BETA, W, AND ANB ANGLES IN SAGITTAL SKELETAL ASSESSMENT USING FACAD SOFTWAREOriginal Research · 2026
3COMPARATIVE RELIABILITY OF THE TAU ANGLE VERSUS YEN, BETA, W, AND ANB ANGLES IN SAGITTAL SKELETAL ASSESSMENT USING FACAD SOFTWAREOriginal Research · 2026
4COMPARATIVE RELIABILITY OF THE TAU ANGLE VERSUS YEN, BETA, W, AND ANB ANGLES IN SAGITTAL SKELETAL ASSESSMENT USING FACAD SOFTWAREOriginal Research · 2026
5COMPARATIVE RELIABILITY OF THE TAU ANGLE VERSUS YEN, BETA, W, AND ANB ANGLES IN SAGITTAL SKELETAL ASSESSMENT USING FACAD SOFTWAREOriginal Research · 2026