Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a reliable diagnostic method to discriminate gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SEL). We aimed to evaluate the factors affecting of EUS-FNA procedure's diagnostic success in SEL.Method:Between May 2010-March 2020, all patients who underwent EUS-FNA were retrospectively evaluated. Factors effecting success rate (number of passes, needle size, lesion size, lesion localization, endoscopist's experience and presence of on-site cytopathologist) were investigated.Results:A total of 170 procedures were performed. SEL localization was 36.5% (n=62) esophagus, 55.9% (n=95) stomach. The mean lesion size was 26.5 ± 14.5 mm. Fourty one percent of lesions were <20 mm. In 115 (67.6%) of procedures, cytopatology was diagnostic and most common were spindle cell tumors (SCT) (n=42, 24.7%), followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) (n=31, 18.2%) and leiyomyommas (n=21, 12.4%). EUS-FNA success was higher in SEL >20mm (p=0.02) and endoscopist's experience (p = 0.001). Lesion's localization, layer and echogenicity, needle size, number of passes didn't affect success rate. The lesion size >20 mm (P=0.01), endoscopist's experience (P=0.003) and presence of cell block (P=0.02) were independent predictors for diagnostic success.Conclusions:EUS-FNA procedure is an effective method, lesion size, endoscopist's experience and presence of cell block increases the yield of cytological diagnosis in SEL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumanlı et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: