Background This commentary examines the historic primacy of behavioural interventions in psychotherapeutic work with neurodivergent people. Such interventions have been increasingly criticised as failing to affirm aspects of neurodivergence as significant for one's identity and positive sense of self, instead emphasising conformity to socially and academically determined norms, which may not always be the goals of the individual engaging with therapy. Findings Relational therapeutic interventions, which have not traditionally been centred in clinical approaches with this group of people, have great potential to address the inadequacies of more behaviourally oriented modalities as they were designed to address experiences of internalised stigma and invalidation, enhance a cohesive sense of self, affirm intersectional identity, tune into emotional experiences, and engage in healing through relationships and connection. Discussion While further research is needed to support the efficacy of relational approaches in work alongside neurodivergent people, their application is promising and aligned with the expressed needs of this community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuld et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: