This case study describes how a teacher and speech-language pathologist (SLP) collaborated to differentiate narrative language instruction in a pre-K classroom for 10 kindergarten-age children who did not meet benchmarks for school readiness at school entry. Using an evidence-based intervention and a response to intervention (RTI) framework, progress monitoring showed that six of the 10 participants responded to Tier 1 instruction, two caught up to peers after six sessions of Tier 2 instruction, and two remained minimally responsive following Tier 3 instruction. Results indicated that assessment and intervention procedures were effective for identifying academically at-risk students to refer for additional evaluation. The procedures were also efficient, requiring approximately 1.2 h per week for intervention and assessment. Implications include recommendations to improve efficiency further in applied settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: