Comparison Between Mortality Scoring Systems in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Reliability and Effectiveness

Hatice Feray Arı; Salim Reşitoğlu; Mehmet Akif Tuncel; Mahmut Can Şerbetçi

doi:10.31362/patd.1479595

June 24, 2024Pamukkale Medical JournalOpen Access

Comparison Between Mortality Scoring Systems in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Reliability and Effectiveness

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Mortality risk showed significant correlation with scores from pediatric risk of mortality III, PIM3, PELOD-2, and pediatric sequential organ failure assessment.
Overall mortality reached 18.7% with 56 deaths, confirming that pediatric index of mortality scoring effectively mirrors clinical severity during intensive care.
Retrospective single-center study analysed patients aged one month to 18 years, highlighting how pediatric logistic organ dysfunction metrics support prognostic care.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Retrospective single-center study demonstrates significant mortality risk prediction across scoring tools in pediatric intensive care patients, highlighting their clinical prognostic value.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Arı et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e63913b6db6435875cb08b https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1479595

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Comparison Between Mortality Scoring Systems in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Reliability and Effectiveness

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Comparison Between Mortality Scoring Systems in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Reliability and Effectiveness

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading