Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To understand the effect of the interactions between Ce‐treated steel and refractory on steel cleanliness, the high‐temperature reaction behaviors of Ce‐treated Al‐killed steel with different refractories (MgO, Al 2 O 3 , MgO⋅Al 2 O 3 , and CeO 2 ) are investigated in laboratory at different times (30–90 min), and the inclusions in steel and the total oxygen contents of the steel are also analyzed. The results show that when the MgO refractory contacts with conventional Al‐killed steel grades, MgO‐Al 2 O 3 spinel is generated as the reacted layer at the boundary; while it reacts with Ce‐treated steel, MgO–Al 2 O 3 spinel is also formed, but it further transforms into Ce 2 O 2 S and CeAlO 3 with time. In the Ce‐treated steel, CeAlO 3 is proved as the stable phase; thus, the reacted layer of CeAlO 3 can also be detected at the edges of Al 2 O 3 , MgO⋅Al 2 O 3 , and CeO 2 refractories. Ce treatment leads to more serious degradation of refractory, and the thickness of the reacted layers at the steel–refractory boundary decreases with time due to the spalling of the layer, resulting in the formation of many CeAlO 3 macroinclusions in steel and the rise of total oxygen contents of the steel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: