Reconstruction and Formulation of Wiring Authority by The Prosecutor In Corruption Crimes

This research aims to determine how wiretapping authority is regulated in Corruption Crimes. This research is normative legal research. Several approaches were carried out in this normative research, including a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, an analytical approach, a case approach, and a comparative approach. Legal materials are processed deductively, concluding a general problem regarding the concrete situation. Furthermore, the existing legal materials are analyzed to see current and future implementation effectiveness issues. The results of this research indicate that the implementation of the regulation of wiretapping authority in Corruption Crimes at the foreign level includes information wiretapping and the requirements for requesting the appointment of a law enforcement leader, the technical mechanism for wiretapping is legally regulated in law, the results of wiretapping must be used professionally, proportionally and relevantly and the existence of an independent Supervisor. Furthermore, for implementation in Indonesia itself, the regulation of wiretapping has yet to create a special law on wiretapping and procedures for internal wiretapping at the Internal Prosecutor's Office.