Robo-advisors are increasingly seen as a solution for the growing demand for timely and actionable financial advice. However, systematic barriers to their deployment and use persist. Understanding the factors that influence investors' willingness to consult with robo-advisors is key to their wide-scale adoption. This research aims to isolate the factors influencing the willingness to use robo-advisors in investment advisory services. We focus on three drivers: (1) performance of robo-advisors, (2) human-computer interaction, and (3) the reputation of suppliers. Results indicate that 'performance efficacy', 'perceived ease of use', 'customer education', and 'corporate reputation' positively influence the perceived value, leading to higher adoption intention. Additionally, 'performance efficacy', 'perceived privacy protection' and 'corporate reputation' positively contributes to the building of trust, which in turn leads to higher adoption intention and asset allocation ratio. For adoption intention of robo-advisors, low-experience investors are "value-driven", while highly experienced investors are "trust-driven". The research highlights the potential of artificial intelligence-based applications for user behavior research and suggests design improvement for robo-advisor developers to increase adoption in financial advisory services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: