Kavita [] analyze the width of the mass distributions of fission fragments from <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mmultiscripts><a:mi>Si</a:mi><a:mprescripts/><a:none/><a:mn>28</a:mn></a:mmultiscripts><a:mo>+</a:mo><a:mmultiscripts><a:mi>Gd</a:mi><a:mprescripts/><a:none/><a:mn>160</a:mn></a:mmultiscripts></a:mrow></a:math> and <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:mrow><b:mmultiscripts><b:mi mathvariant="normal">C</b:mi><b:mprescripts/><b:none/><b:mn>12</b:mn></b:mmultiscripts><b:mo>+</b:mo><b:mmultiscripts><b:mi>Hf</b:mi><b:mprescripts/><b:none/><b:mn>178</b:mn></b:mmultiscripts></b:mrow></b:math> collisions. The authors report that the distributions “are reproducible with a single Gaussian at all studied energies”. However, the fits presented in the figures show functions that do not correspond to single-Gaussian distributions. A critical analysis, presented here, sheds doubts on the characterization of the mass distributions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Caamaño (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: